Terrestrial Laser Scanning
Calibration of Terrestrial Laser Scanners
Terrestrial Laser Scanners have become a standard sensor extensively utilized in engineering geodesy and related sub-disciplines. Owing to continual advancements, its usage has expanded to high-quality measurement tasks. Nevertheless, internal misalignments introduce systematic deviations in the point cloud. Effective calibration strategies minimize these deviations.
A dedicated calibration field has been designed specifically for calibrating Terrestrial Laser Scanners, enabling the determination of essential calibration parameters and their stochastic information for high-end scanners with minimal effort (a-priori calibration). Considering these parameters significantly enhances the quality of resultant point clouds. However, certain crucial parameters for low-cost laser scanners cannot be ascertained in this calibration field. Additionally, some parameters exhibit temporal instability and substantial dependence on external conditions (e.g. temperature). In-situ calibration serves as a solution, where calibration parameters are directly determined based on the point clouds from the measurement task. This approach allows the determination of parameters relevant to low-cost terrestrial laser scanners that are directly applicable to the specific measurement environment.
Contacts:
- Medić, Tomislav (2021) Efficient calibration strategies for panoramic terrestrial laser scanners. - Bonn, 2021. - Dissertation, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn.Online-Ausgabe in bonndoc: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:5-60976
- Medić, T., Kuhlmann, H., & Holst, C. (2020b) Designing and Evaluating a User-Oriented Calibration Field for the Target-Based Self-Calibration of Panoramic Terrestrial Laser Scanners, Remote Sens., 12 (1), 15, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12010015
- Medić, T., Kuhlmann, H., & Holst, C. (2020a) A priori versus in-situ terrestrial laser scanner calibration in the context of the instability of calibration parameters, Contributions to International Conferences on Engineering Surveying, INGEO & SIG 2020, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51953-7_11
- Medić, T., Kuhlmann, H., & Holst, C. (2019a) Automatic in-situ self-calibration of a panoramic TLS from a single station using 2D keypoints, ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2/W5, 413-420, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-413-2019
- Medić, T., Kuhlmann, H., Holst, C. (2019d) Sensitivity Analysis and Minimal Measurement Geometry for the Target-Based Calibration of High-End Panoramic Terrestrial Laser Scanners, Remote Sens., 11 (13), 1519, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11131519
Stochastic model of terrestrial laser scans
Using terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) to acquire geometric properties of surfaces has been proven to be a solid procedure in tasks of industrial and classical survey. New TLS measure with a rate of up to two million points per second and generate a highly dense three-dimensional point cloud. Accordingly, they have a high spatio-temporal resolution.
In terms of deformation analyses, the results depend on the stochastic characteristics of the point cloud. They are defined by the covariance matrix of the observations, which consists of variances and covariances. The variances of the range observations can be derived from a functional model as they solely depend on the intensity of the measured points. Yet, the correlations and, thus, the covariances are not sufficiently known and therefore neglected.
We develop methodologies to quantify covariances empirically to set up a fully populated covariance matrix of the point cloud. Therefore, we established a test field called “The Bonn Reference Wall” that has a known geometry to analyze point clouds for their uncertainty.
Contacts:
- Jost, B. (2023) Strategies for the Empirical Determination of the Stochastic Properties of Terrestrial Laser Scans. Dissertation, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn. Online-Ausgabe in bonndoc: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:5-71297
- Jost, B., Coopmann, D., Holst, C. & Kuhlmann, H. (2023). How to be more accurate than a single laser scan: Creating the reference geometry of a large wall. In A. Wieser (Ed.), Beiträge zum 20. Internationalen Ingenieurvermessungskurs, 11.-14. April 2023, Zurich, Switzerland (pp. 131–144).: Wichmann, Berlin, Offenbach.
- Jost, B., Coopmann, D., Holst, C., & Kuhlmann, H. (2023). Real movement or systematic errors? – TLS-based deformation analysis of a concrete wall. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 17(2), 139–149.
- Schmitz, B., Coopmann, D., Kuhlmann, H., Holst, C. (2021) Using the Resolution Capability and the Effective Number of Measurements to Select the "Right" Terrestrial Laser Scanner, In: Kopáčik, A., Kyrinovič, P., Erdélyi, J., Paar, R., Marendić, A. (Eds.): Contributions to International Conferences on Engineering Surveying, INGEO & SIG 2020, Dubrovnik, Croatia. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham, 85-97.
- Schmitz, B., Kuhlmann, H., Holst, C. (2020) Investigating the resolution capability of terrestrial laser scanners and its impact on the effective number of measurements, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. (159), 41-52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.11.002
- Schmitz, B., Holst, C., Medic, T., Lichti D. D., Kuhlmann, H. (2019) How to Efficiently Determine the Range Precision of 3D Terrestrial Laser Scanners, Sensors, 19 (6), 1466, doi:10.3390/s19061466
- Jurek, T., Holst Ch., Kuhlmann, H. (2017) Impact of spatial correlations on the surface estimation based on terrestrial laser scanning, J. Appl. Geodesy, 11 (3), 143-155, doi:10.1515/jag-2017-0006
- Holst, Ch., Kuhlmann, H. (2016) Challenges and Present Fields of Action at Laser Scanner Based Deformation Analyses, J. Appl. Geodesy, 10 (1), S. 17-25 (identical with: Holst, Ch., Kuhlmann, H. (2016) Challenges and Present Fields of Action at Laser Scanner Based Deformation Analyses, 3rd Joint International Symposium on Deformation Monitoring (JISDM), 30th March - 1st April 2016, Vienna)
- Holst, Ch., Artz, T., Kuhlmann, H. (2014) Biased and unbiased estimates based on laser scans of surfaces with unknown deformations, J. Appl. Geodesy, 8 (3), S. 169-184
Point-based and Area-based Deformation Analyses
Since several years, the areal acquisition of objects and their geometries - up to an integrated space continualization - got into focus of engineering geodesy. Consequently, objects are no longer sampled and discretized by a small number of individually defined signalized points. Instead, they are area-wise sampled by a large number of non-signalized points whose individual positions cannot be set up. This fact makes completely new demands regarding the subsequent data processing: Up to now, deformation analyses are focused on analyzing single points or point differences to decide whether the sampled object is deformed at selected positions.
Since there are no longer signalized points when using laser scanners and, thus, also no longer identical points between two epochs, judging an object to be deformed can only be based on an areal parameterization. In the figure below, we compare two epochs of the Brucher water dam measured with TLS. The geometry of the dam changes up to 1 cm between summer and winter. However, the movement cannot be judged with a real, statistically correct deformation analysis, as the stochastic model of the point cloud is not yet sufficiently known.
Contacts:
- Jost, B., Coopmann, D., Holst, C., & Kuhlmann, H. (2023). Real movement or systematic errors? – TLS-based deformation analysis of a concrete wall. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 17(2), 139–149.
- Holst, C., Klingbeil, L., Esser, F., Kuhlmann, H. (2017) Using point cloud comparisons for revealing deformations of natural and artificial objects, 7th International Conference on Engineering Surveying (INGEO), 18-20 October 2017, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Holst, Ch., Schmitz, B., Kuhlmann, H. (2017) Investigating the applicability of standard software packages for laser scanner based deformation analyses, FIG Working Week 2017, May 29 - June 02, Helsinki, Finland
- Holst, Ch., Schmitz, B., Schraven, A., Kuhlmann, H. (2017) Eignen sich in Standardsoftware implementierte Punktwolkenvergleiche zur flächenhaften Deformationsanalyse von Bauwerken? Eine Fallstudie anhand von Laserscans einer Holzplatte und einer Staumauer, zfv - Zeitschrift für Geodäsie, Geoinformation und Landmanagement, 2/2017, S. 98-110, doi:10.12902/zfv-0158-2017
- Holst, Ch., Kuhlmann, H. (2016) Challenges and Present Fields of Action at Laser Scanner Based Deformation Analyses, J. Appl. Geodesy, 10 (1), S. 17-25 (identical with: Holst, Ch., Kuhlmann, H. (2016) Challenges and Present Fields of Action at Laser Scanner Based Deformation Analyses, 3rd Joint International Symposium on Deformation Monitoring (JISDM), 30th March - 1st April 2016, Vienna)
- Neuner, H., Holst, Ch., Kuhlmann, H. (2016) Overview on Current Modelling Strategies of Point Clouds for Deformation Analysis, Allgem. Verm. Nachr, 11-12/2016, S. 328-339, Wichmann Verlag, Berlin
- Wunderlich, T., Niemeier, W., Wujanz, D., Holst, Ch., Neitzel, F., Kuhlmann, H. (2016) Areal Deformation Analysis from TLS Point Clouds - The Challenge, Allgem. Verm. Nachr, 11-12/2016, S. 340-351, Wichmann Verlag, Berlin
Resolution Capability
The fast and dense data acquisition of terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) gives many opportunities to sample objects with many details. Nowadays, TLSs are capable to sample up to two million points per second with a point spacing of less than a millimeter on ten meters, and a point accuracy of a few millimeters or even less. However, the size of objects that can be spatially resolved in a point cloud varies between different scanners as it depends on the point distance as well as on the laser spot size: If the object is scanned with a high resolution, neighboring laser spots overlap as the laser beam is at least a few millimeters. Hence, they do not provide individual information about the object and the resolution does not equal the resolution capability.
We develop methodologies to determine the resolution capability for different scanners to answer the following questions:
- Which objects can my scanner resolve?
- Which scanner can resolve my object?
- Which are the optimal settings for an economic and efficient data acquisition?
Contacts:
- Schmitz, B., Coopmann, D., Kuhlmann, H., Holst, C. (2021) Using the Resolution Capability and the Effective Number of Measurements to Select the "Right" Terrestrial Laser Scanner, In: Kopáčik, A., Kyrinovič, P., Erdélyi, J., Paar, R., Marendić, A. (Eds.): Contributions to International Conferences on Engineering Surveying, INGEO & SIG 2020, Dubrovnik, Croatia. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham, 85-97.
- Schmitz, B., Kuhlmann, H., Holst, C. (2020) Investigating the resolution capability of terrestrial laser scanners and its impact on the effective number of measurements, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. (159), 41-52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.11.002
Integration of digital imagery into TLS point clouds
In recent years, the spatial capture of geometries using terrestrial laser scanners has moved into the focus of engineering geodesy. But especially at object discontinuities -particularly along edges- issues like mixed pixels, smoothing effects, missing the discontinuity etc. arises frequently. However, depending on the measurement project, the level of detail in the point clouds may not be sufficient.
Particularly at object discontinuities the integration of digital images into TLS point clouds provides the opportunity to enhance the level of detail. Due to the fusion of images and TLS point clouds it becomes possible to generate new points in the point cloud that represent object edges more accurately compared to the TLS point cloud itself. In this process, algorithms are strategically employed to maximize the complementary capabilities of the sensors to compensate their disadvantages.
TLS point clouds can be enhanced, for example, through the integration of UAV images. The resultant points exhibit a considerably reduced distance from the actual edge compared to points that can be identified in the TLS point cloud as “edge points”. The quality of the newly generated points depends mainly on the accuracy of intrinsic and extrinsic camera calibration and the Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) of the image.
Contacts:
- Koller, E., Klingbeil, L., Kuhlmann, (2023). Improvement of Edge Reconstruction in TLS PointClouds using additional Image Information, In: Wieser, A. (Hrsg.): Ingenieurvermessung 23, Beiträge zum 20. Internationalen Ingenieurvermessungskurs, Zurich, Schweiz, Wichmann Verlag, Berlin, Offenbach
Contact
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heiner Kuhlmann
Head of working group
1.010
Nußallee 17
53115 Bonn